![]() 11/14/2017 at 22:19 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 11/14/2017 at 22:44 |
|
Looks Packard-ish, but that’s all I’ve got.
![]() 11/14/2017 at 22:46 |
|
Not sure, possibly a late 1910s/early 20s White.
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:09 |
|
I’m getting deja vu. I’m pretty sure someone else asked about this exact same photo some time ago. I’ll see if I can find that post.
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:12 |
|
I’m sure you’re right - was thinking the same thing
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:37 |
|
getting closer? 1916 oakland speedster.....
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:41 |
|
I think t was me 2 years ago. Still trying to figure it out exactly.
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:51 |
|
Well damn. OP originally posted about year and a half back: http://oppositelock.kinja.com/since-im-not-the-only-one-asking-1784162579
Google must’ve tweaked their reverse GIS, because its not popping up at all. I still think what kanadanmajava1 posted is the answer: 1916 Oakland Model 38 Speedster.
http://www.simeonemuseum.org/the-collection/sporty-cars/1916-oakland-model-38-speedster
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:52 |
|
Is it not the Oakland Speedster?
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:54 |
|
I’m going to agree. 1915 or 1916 Oakland. The body may be homemade or coachbuilt, from a kit, etc. as was pretty common in those days. But the V radiator and other details match Oakland.
Take this view of a touring car, taken from a near identical angle as the OP’s photo:
Looks the same from the cowl forward.
![]() 11/14/2017 at 23:54 |
|
The windscreen and side vents match
I looked elsewhere because of the wire wheels in his pic
![]() 11/15/2017 at 00:03 |
|
yeah, it was that big v in the radiator, and the big arches on the fenders that narrowed it down... it looks like a speedster, which was basically a bare bones car frame with 2 seats, and a flat deck.... would be fun stuff nowadays......
![]() 11/15/2017 at 00:06 |
|
yeah, those wire wheels are probably some later add on. wires didnt seem to catch on on most cars until the late 20s.....
![]() 11/15/2017 at 00:14 |
|
Well, the angles were close enough that I thought I would try overlaying the images. I think the result is convincing.
![]() 11/15/2017 at 15:09 |
|
classic 3-d stereo vision picture at its finest....... its like in back to the future where the family starts disappearing from his photo ......
thats some fine follow up work too.....